//
you're reading...
-[Film Reviews]-, Bollywood, SOUTH ASIAN CINEMA

‘Krrish’ (2003, 2006, 2013): Trilogy Review

Directed by: Rakesh Roshan || Produced by: Rakesh Roshan

Screenplay by: Javed Siddiqui [KMG], Rakesh Roshan, Honey Irani, Robin Bhatt [Trilogy], Sachin Bhowmick [KMG, Krrish], Sanjay Masoomi [Krrish, Krrish 3], Akash Khurana [Krrish] || Starring: Hrithik Roshan Rekha, Priety Zinta, Priyanka Chopra, Naseeruddin Shah, Vivek Oberoi, Kangana Ranaut

Music by: Rajesh Roshan, Salim-Sulaiman [Krrish, Krrish 3] || Cinematography: Sameer Arya, Ravi K. Chandran [KMG], Santosh Thundiyil [Krrish], Tirru [Krrish 3] || Edited by: Sanjay Verma [KMG], Amitabh Shukla [Krrish], Chandan Arora [Krrish 3] || Country: India || Language: Hindi

Running Time: 166 minutes, 175 minutes, 152 minutes = 493 minutes total

Bollywood cinema in particular and Indian cinema in general are famous for their filmmaking “family clans,” nepotistic organizations linked by love and law, through marriage and across generations. A few years ago, for instance, former Bollywood star actress Aishwarya Rai joined the famed Bachchan clan by marrying wannabe star Abhishek Bachchan, son of Amitabh Bachchan; the latter is considered the most famous man in India, as well as one of its greatest actors.

Rekha cradles her son, Rohit (Hrithik Roshan, left) in KMG and grandson, Krishna (also Roshan, right) in Krrish.

Another notable Indian filmmaking patriarch is Rakesh Roshan, a prolific Bollywood actor, writer, producer, and director who has been active in the Hindi film industry since the 1970s. To modern audiences, he is most well known for launching the career of his son, Hrithik Roshan, with the romantic drama/action hybrid, Kaho Naa… Pyaar Hai (2000) and later cementing it with the Krrish Trilogy.

The Krrish Trilogy has as much in common with modern Hollywood megafranchises as it does with contemporary Bollywood filmmaking. While both the original (Koi… Mil Gaya [2003]) and its first sequel (Krrish [2006]) are typical industry genre-blenders, the former is unique in that it is likely India’s first science-fiction film, while the latter transitioned the series into a superhero franchise. Sci-fi movies are commonplace in Hollywood but still rare overseas, while superhero filmmaking and retrofitting existing intellectual properties to fit modern audience tastes are the industry’s bread and butter. To put it bluntly, the Krrish Trilogy transforms from a sci-fi riff on 1990s Bollywood romance to an unabashed superhero action franchise by its third installment. This artistic cross-pollination becomes more intriguing upon noting the similarities of Koi… Mil Gaya (henceforth, KMG) to Steven Spielberg’s E.T. The Extraterrestrial (1982), which in turn is said to have been inspired by an unproduced Satyajit Ray screenplay from the 1960s.

KMG is the small beginning from which the big, big Krrish Trilogy (currently India’s third highest grossing series of all time) would grow. Other than its modest sci-fi twist, Hrithik Roshan’s sophomore hit is vintage 90s Bollywood: Every frame (even in nighttime sequences) is overexposed, characters wear cheesy, colorful, baggy costumes, acting is theatrical and over-the-top, and X-game stunts (e.g. scooters, motorbikes, etc.) are utilized as action sequences. The opening act following the prologue is almost brilliant so-bad-it’s-good cheese that films like Kuch Kuch Hota Hai (1998) or Hum Aapke Hain Koun (1994) should take notes. While yes, this film was released in the early 2000s, like Kaho Naa… Pyaar Hai before it, it is a carryover from another era; its significant science-fiction undertones notwithstanding, KMG has more in common with Dilwale Dulhania La Jayenge (1995) than either 3 Idiots (2009) or E. T.

Perhaps that’s why Rajkumar Hirani’s Munna Bhai: MBBS (2003) sucked and 3 Idiots didn’t — proximity to a decade most of us (even Millennials) would like to forget. Anyway…

The premise of KMG concerns an astronomer (co-writer, producer, and director Rakesh Roshan) who makes contact with an alien intelligence, and while chasing a sighting in his vehicle, he crashes, killing himself and injuring his pregnant wife (Bhanurekha Ganesan, aka “Rekha”). When Rekha later gives birth to his child, Rohit Mehra (Hrithik Roshan), she discovers he is mentally handicapped due to injuries sustained during this close encounter of the third kind. The bulk of the story follows Hrithik, who both falls in love with default romantic interest Preity Zinta and discovers more about the aforementioned alien race when they return to earth.

LEFT: Krrish (Hrithik Roshan) sizes up another supervillain threat in Krrish 3. RIGHT, top: An unmasked Krishna Mehra (Roshan) dances it up with a motorcycle in Krrish (2006). RIGHT, bottom: A gleeful Naseeruddin Shah (right) holds an elderly Rohit (Roshan, left) hostage.

While the alien subplot adds motivation for Hrithik’s later actions and sets the plot in motion, the bulk of the narrative is dedicated, as one would expect, to Hrithik’s personal development, his relationships with Rekha and Zinta, and his eventual acceptance by the local community. I was never sold on Hrithik’s questionable portrayal of a developmentally disabled character, but his arc is so endearing, sci-fi twist and all, I couldn’t help but embrace the camp. His arc is a mix of decent pacing, a good supporting cast, the aforementioned alien subplot, and Hrithik’s enviable dance moves. At the end of the day, a determined protagonist who tries to protect his cute alien friend from government abduction works as a movie, both because and in spite of his goofball mannerisms.

The first sequel, Krrish, much like The Dark Knight (2008), was the series’ breakout title that would retroactively define and rename the entire trilogy, and is also the best film in the series. The movie is as much a genre-blender as its predecessor, but is a better, more seamless one. After a significant time gap between films and the off-screen removal of Preity Zinta, Krrish begins much like any major Bollywood hit, with goofy slapstick, melodramatic soap opera acting (effective melodrama, mind you), and the elongated introduction of our new female love interest, Priyanka Chopra. The narrative transitions gradually from your standard Hindi romance — with the mildest of sci-fi undertones — to a competent action film with charismatic superhero flavor.

This genre transition works for two reasons: (1) Hrithik and Chopra’s relationship functions as the core of the story, as well as audience sympathy, and (2) acclaimed actor Naseeruddin Shah sells the superhero conflict as a great villain. The latter also incorporates Hrithik’s previous starring role in KMG (the actor is double cast both as the titular hero, Krishna Mehra/Krrish, and his father, Rohit, the protagonist of the previous film), which provides motivation for both Chopra and Hrithik’s Krrish beyond standard Bollywood filler or generic heroics. It’s an impressive twist I didn’t see coming.

Some fun wire-fu from Krrish (2006). Note the obvious Matrix (1999) influences.

As for the film’s action itself, it’s a middling affair between the cartoonish yet digitally bedazzled works of Hollywood superhero blockbusters and the grounded theatrics of Joel Schumacher’s Phantom of the Opera (2004), as well as various East Asian kung fu movies. The action sequences are limited in size and scope due to technological limitations, no doubt, but this works to the film’s advantage since it maintains emphasis on our lead characters, not the FX. There’s enough dumb action for those who want it, but at its heart, Krrish 2006 is a Bollywood romance about love and family with a significant but ultimately secondary superhero coating.

Krrish 3 (2013), on the other hand, is a full-fledged, unapologetic superhero feature in the vein of Spider-Man (2002) or Superman Returns (2006) — but not so much Dawn of Justice (2016), Iron Man (2008), or The Dark Knight Rises (2012). As a matter of fact, the worst thing about Krrish 3 is how hard it tries to imitate a Hollywood superhero flick, often to its detriment. The film’s Indianization” of American blockbuster tropes are minimal, considering how both industries have coalesced around a semi-bloated running time average of two and a half hours, and the musical numbers are forgettable outside of Hrithik’s dancing. The result is more or less impotent, unimaginative blockbuster spectacle. Put another way, it is the polar opposite of a film like Baahubali (2015, 2017).

The action scenes are a step below the campy wire-FX and stylized martial arts of Krrish 2006, utilizing extensive (and obvious) blue-screen backgrounds in addition to numerous CGI characterizations and questionable digital FX superpowers. Even worse are the laughable costume designs of everyone besides Hrithik; all the bad guys, including and especially main antagonist Vivek Oberoi, look like a cross between X-Men (2000-present) ripoffs and Mighty Morphin’ Power Rangers (1993-1995) villains. Needless to say, these poor costumes distract from any emotional weight these set-pieces might otherwise have.

The saving graces of Krrish 3 are Hrithik’s dual roles and the father-son relationship between them, as well as Priyanka Chopra’s performance. As cheesy as these characters are, Hrithik brings real humanity to both of them, and his final portrayal of the older Rohit Mehra (the protagonist of KMG) has emotional payoff. Chopra, while somewhat sidelined from her prominent role in Krrish 2006, plays her doe-eyed, dopey character well, adding further weight to Krrish’s motivation and development.

A recurring positive about all three films are Hrithik Roshan’s killer dance moves. A scalding hot Priyanka Chopra in the latter two movies doesn’t hurt, either.

Altogether, the Krrish Trilogy is an interesting experiment in Hindi blockbuster filmmaking. I wouldn’t describe it as a rousing success from first installment to the last, but as a dynamic, genre-blending mini-series, it boasts considerable entertainment value and more than enough heart. Western viewers will be caught off guard, to be sure, so prior exposure to Indian cinema is recommended — you’ll need to understand how to turn off that anti-camp switch in your brain. The series runs the gamut of Bollywood cheese, from hardcore 90s(-esque) melodrama to 2000s genre-blending to 2010s Hollywood ripoffs, and more of it works than not. Much of this cinematic appeal is due to Rakesh Roshan utilizing his son’s star power for maximum effect, while developing his supporting cast (also including his son) over the course of all three films. Not surprisingly, it’s the human relationships that provide stability and support for all the superfluous FX, action scenes, and so-so dance numbers.

——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————-

SUMMARY & RECOMMENDATION: Koi… Mil Gaya is a bit long in the tooth and doesn’t always nail its camp humor, but its bizarre sci-fi riff and strong cast see it through. Krrish (2006) is the strongest of the bunch, melding romantic Bollywood cliches with just the right amount of action and superhero theatrics, in addition to fleshing out Hrithik’s dual roles and adding a memorable villain in Naseeruddin Shah. Krrish 3 is the runt of the litter, entertainment-wise and artistically speaking, given its lackluster FX, bland action choreography, and forgettable villainy.

—> RECOMMENDED. Just remember to be in the right mood for each film. They all require different moods and viewing expectations.

? I wonder how much the second film’s development hinged on Preity Zinta not reprising her role. Did Rakesh Roshan decide to focus on the superhero angle before or after the production team moved on without her?

About The Celtic Predator

I love movies, music, video games, and big, scary creatures.

Discussion

5 thoughts on “‘Krrish’ (2003, 2006, 2013): Trilogy Review

  1. I remember watching Krrish, but drifted away from Bollywood before the franchise continued. Roshan wasn’t an actor I ever really warmed to. I don’t think I was as forgiving as you to the production values in Bollywood, and once Ram Gopal Varma disappeared up his own backside I bailed out. But I keep telling myself I should go back and see where the industry’s up to these days.

    Looking back on things it’s pleasing to see Irrfan Khan made a name for himself outside India, I always thought he had a lot of talent. And no one took any notice of me at the time, but I predicted Priyanka Chopra would go further than Aishwarya Rai. Just wish Ishaa Khoppikar had stuck to it instead of marrying a restaurant owner!

    Posted by The Opening Sentence | June 27, 2017, 1:53 pm
    • Priyanka’s star will continue to rise so long as she continues to pick good projects, which is definitely the case back home but not so much in the US (e.g. Quantico, Baywatch). Still, her sex appeal is as potent as anybody’s, so she’ll have plenty of star-power for years as long as she doesn’t have a mid-career meltdown, and she strikes me as pretty emotionally stable as far as actors go. Same deal with Hrithik, and I agree on Irrfan Khan.

      As for your disillusionment with modern Bollywood, I understand. I tell all my brown friends (there are many, many international students in the US) how impatient I am with Bollywood movies about NRIs, Indians traveling in the West, and Hollywood ripoffs (e.g. Dhoom 3).

      That being said, I think Indian cinema (if not Bollywood in particular) is coming back around with original pictures like Baahubali that aren’t ripoffs of existing properties but rather something unique to their culture. I also have hope for modern Hindi dramas like 3 Idiots, PK, and Haider. Some of this may be due to the arts opening up in India as the political culture becomes more right-wing, reactionary, and Hindu nationalist. You see the same thing in Hollywood when our political leaders go more old-school. Filmmakers tend to take more chances, which is usually a good thing.

      Posted by The Celtic Predator | June 27, 2017, 5:48 pm
      • I think one of the things that probably ground me down about Bollywood was the concentration around four or five ‘clans,’ who tended to play it safe and it all evolved from being a ‘freshly discovered treasure trove’ to an ‘actually not that varied cabinet.’ I would hope that if the industry accepted more outsiders it would flourish with new blood and new ideas.

        Interesting what you say about films reacting to the political colour of the day. I hadn’t noticed that. I am familiar with the idea that science fiction films tend to reflect our fears, but hadn’t taken notice how other genres react to political discourse.

        Posted by The Opening Sentence | June 28, 2017, 1:28 pm
  2. While you are busy reviewing other movies, the new Transformers movie is actually waiting for you… 😉

    Posted by indie sci-fi 451 | July 1, 2017, 7:58 pm

Am I spot on? Am I full of it? Let me know!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: