you're reading...
-[Film Reviews]-, Bollywood, South Asian Cinema

‘Kuch Kuch Hota Hai’ (1998): The Mecca of 1990s “Cool”


Directed by: Karan Johar || Produced by: Yash Johar, Hiroo Johar

Screenplay by: Karan Johar || Starring: Shahrukh Khan, Kajol, Rani Mukerji, Salman Khan, Anupam Kher, Farida Jalal, Sana Saeed

Music by: Jatin-Lalit || Cinematography: Santosh Thundiyil, Santosh Sivan || Editing by: Sanjay Sankla || Country: India || Language: Hindi

Running Time: 185 minutes

Awful performances and partially effective storytelling come to an awkward head in this long, star-studded Bollywood “Hit” about friendship, college romance, and (surprise surprise) love-triangles. This movie possesses some of the most painful and cringe-worthy moments I have seen put to film. The overly goofy and awkward dialogue, combined with the incredibly cheesy, over-the-top performances from actors Shah Rukh Khan (SRK) and Kajol to Rani Mukerji and Salman Khan to Anupam Kher and Archana Puran Singh, all the way to the stage dancers, make Kuch Kuch Hota Hai (henceforth, KKHH) feel as downright offensive to my intelligence as this run-on sentence.

Top: Aside from a typically colorful Bollywood-palette, Kuch Kuch Hota Hai brings nothing recommendable to the table. Nothing in its standard-issue romance justifies its 3-hour+ runtime. Bottom: The film’s hair, makeup, and costume design are almost as ridiculous as the acting. Case in point: This picture of the “oh so adorable” Sana Saeed.

But I digress… this movie’s really about love, right? And what love there is, in this boring, impotent plot. KKHH is based on the love-triangle formed by its three central characters, played by SRK, Kajol, and Mukerji, who meet during college. Needless to say, many things go awry, volatile emotions are stirred, relationship intentions are misunderstood, people die, and it all ends in another long, drawn-out wedding elopement climax. It’s like a logical computer program wrote the screenplay.

It’s interesting to dig beneath the surface of movie-magic and story formulas to see how, like organisms of an ecosystem, films from different genres and separate cultures are often far more closely related than we realize. Comparing KKHH and, say, The Expendables 2 (2012), you have two films that are paced very badly, that go way overboard with their cringe-inducing dialogue and bad jokes. Just like KKHH should have tried to cut its losses by skimming on the melodrama and designing less boring dance numbers, Stallone’s lazy-as-hell ensemble sequel should have focused on delivering the bone-crunching action it promised, instead of giving us an hour of roid-fueled ’80’s has-beens pretending to be dramatic actors. KKHH is the South Asian equivalent of a bad American action-movie, swapping the sleep-inducing action scenes for disorganized dancing, but keeping the bad acting.

Perhaps a better way to describe KKHH is to imagine the famous Dilwale Dulhania Le Jayenge (1995), also starring SRK and Kajol, but without the beautiful outdoor photography, the fun musical numbers, and replacing every ounce of Khan’s charm in that role with an irritating cartoon. In fact, an effective way to describe everyone’s character in this movie is as a cartoon. Even if this exact script was shot as an animated film, it would remain irritating and boring, but at least it would be bearable. As a live-action experience, though, KKHH is like attending the birthday party of a younger extended family member whom you hate, like a bratty niece or second cousin. You’re constantly surrounded by people in ridiculous outfits who say ridiculous things in a ridiculous way, and everyone is under the constant illusion that they’re cute or adorable. Are you formulating a tone in your brain, yet?

I would honestly put the level of acting and emotional expression in this movie on the same level as a bad Nickelodeon show or a particularly annoying episode of The Young and the Restless, maybe with all the subtlety and nuance of a Dragon Ball Z show. At least with any of those programs, the pain is over in about 22 minutes, but with KKHH, I had to sit through over three hours of these caricatured performances.

The film’s childish set-design feels almost as caricatured and fake as the performances. Everything from the film’s costume design to the hair and makeup feel like live-action counterparts of an outlandish children’s cartoon. To the film’s credit, the colorful design of everything is nice, but it’s hard to appreciate much of the film’s technical design when everything about the story and direction feels so bizarre and artificial. KKHH’s visuals make me think of a snack drenched in food coloring and made of unnatural ingredients — something that looks processed, sterile, and manufactured on an assembly line. The movie looks as dumb as it sounds.

What do I have to say that’s positive about one of the King Khan’s and Kajol’s most famous, commercially successful smash hits? Well, not much. What I do like about KKHH is the effective use of flashbacks to make it one of the few Bollywood films that justifies its two-act structure. The songs are decent, I guess. That’s about it.


Just like any other film industry, Bollywood has its grossly overrated super-hits. This is one of them.

What else is there to say? I feel like I’m already repeating myself. Kuch Kuch Hota Hai, one of the most popular and influential Indian blockbusters of the 1990’s, features terrible acting, cornball dialogue, bland dance sequences, a boring story, and so-so music. This is one of the weakest Bollywood hits I have ever seen. I suppose the story ends in a satisfactory way despite the script’s cliched design, but that alone cannot make up for its juvenile performances and dance scenes that just don’t deliver the goods. Viewers can either choose to come to grips with this issue of caricatured acting or live in fanboy-denial. I maintain that there are two kinds of people in this world — people who understand what I’m saying, and people who like this overrated, nostalgia-fueled trash.


SUMMARY & RECOMMENDATIONAlmost every single scene in Kuch Kuch Hota Hai reaches an unbearable limit of contrived sappiness and cheese. I can’t take any of these characters, conflicts, or jokes seriously whatsoever. This film feels like a Hindi romance version of Batman and Robin (1997), albeit an ever so slightly less excruciating one. Kuch Kuch Hota Hai is just too damned corny for too damned long. Run while you can.

However… the flashbacks in the first half of the movie allow the narrative to unfold naturally in the typical Bollywood two-act structure. Most of the songs are decent. The ending is OK, I suppose.


? London bridge is falling down! Falling down! Falling down! Get it? Because he likes the British! Hahahaha, haha… ha… ha…

About The Celtic Predator

I love movies, music, video games, and big, scary creatures.


23 thoughts on “‘Kuch Kuch Hota Hai’ (1998): The Mecca of 1990s “Cool”

  1. You ripped apart one of my favourite all-time movies…and far from being a sucker for romance, I am one of the worst kinds of cynic. Unfortunately, I think even though you made note of the context that makes productions like this popular in Bollywood, you didn’t really take note of why this might actually be a GREAT movie aimed for commercial audiences (exactly who it was made for) and not critics (exactly who they didn’t make it for).
    At the base of this, you also ignored the fact that for those audiences, this movie has a repeatable/re-watchable quality (naturally, coz you aren’t planning on going near this with a 10-foot barge pole) and the most basic thing it stands for, what we all look for, “proof” that second chances do exist.

    P.S.- Those cheddar-y dialogues? That’s a major part of what gave this movie it’s iconic status…just FYI.

    Posted by Aishani | March 27, 2013, 1:42 am
    • I totally agree with the review. The film has some elements of fun but if you look at it as a narrative with a set of characters and a story to tell, it’s pretty bad. 35 somethings playing college students, the crux of the story being a frustrating lack of communication between characters. There is just not much there that constitutes good film making. But for indian audiences who enjoy seeing their stars bouncing around in films where leaving your brain behind is a requirement, it fulfills the need I guess. This film has no repeat viewing value. I tried watching it last year again with a friend and could not sit through!

      Posted by Nina | November 7, 2017, 10:28 am
      • Thanks for the comment.
        There’s nothing inherently wrong with the film’s setup — love-triangles and romantic melodramas are a dime a dozen in numerous film cultures. KKHH’s main problems for me are (1) the lack of motivation for all principle characters to set the plot in motion — as you pointed out, the entire narrative hinges on ludicrously simplistic misunderstandings b/w relationships that middle-schoolers might be able solve, and (2) the uninteresting characters themselves combined with the highly irritating performances of the main cast.

        In a similarly paper-thin story or premise, such as Devdas (2002), you can overlook many of the shortcomings of the film’s script, characters, or performances because the main attraction is the presentation, i.e. the direction, cinematography, production design, and musical numbers. I would argue the exaggerated characters of even a style-over-substance picture like Devdas are way more interesting than KKHH, but I digress.

        The dilemma with KKHH is that it has no interesting presentation of which to speak. If anything, its presentation and style are distractingly bad; it looks and feels like a live-action cartoon, like the aforementioned Batman & Robin (1997). Therefore, its appeal is dependent on how your view its story, characters, plot-progression, pacing, etc. For me, the equivalent of a 22-minute cartoon melodrama adapted for live-action and stretched to three hours is not my idea of a good time.

        Posted by The Celtic Predator | November 7, 2017, 9:29 pm
  2. I think I must have seen a different movie! I loved KKHH, and I have seen it at least 4-5 times. Yes, it’s campy and colorful, but that was the point of the movie. I wasn’t trying to watch the Dark Knight or a horror movie, nor a realistic love story (which would be “drama” and not “comedy”). I wanted to watch a “Cool” (that’s what Rahul was) movie that was light-hearted and fun.

    Posted by realjeemoney | June 14, 2018, 4:18 pm
    • Thanks for the comment; I’m aware this film, like DDLJ, is respected by a large segment of South Asian society, particularly of a certain age; however, my reaction to this film compared to that of DDLJ or similar cornball Bollywood romances implies my problems with KKHH are not a result of its “cheese” or “light-hearted” nature. I wasn’t looking for a Dark Knight or horror movie either, but a fun, over-the-top romance.

      To me, KKHH is over-the-top in many ways, but none of them are fun. I didn’t care for the characters (… I just found them annoying), no matter how Karan Johar spun it, nor am I a fan of his acting direction or music direction or direction in general. I think he’s an overindulgent, obtuse filmmaker and KKHH is one of his weakest films.

      I have nothing against a simple, straightforward story — some of the better films ever made are constructed from the most basic of narrative formula — but the execution is what matters to me, and the execution of KKHH has zero appeal outside its core audience. I would never recommend it to anyone who wasn’t already a die-hard fan.

      Posted by The Celtic Predator | June 14, 2018, 5:14 pm


  1. Pingback: ‘Dhoom 3′ (2013): Review | Express Elevator to Hell - November 3, 2014

  2. Pingback: ‘Satya’ (1998): Review | Express Elevator to Hell - November 27, 2014

  3. Pingback: ‘Hum Aapke Hain Koun’ (1994): Review | Express Elevator to Hell - November 27, 2014

  4. Pingback: ‘Gone with the Wind’ (1939): Review | Express Elevator to Hell - November 28, 2014

  5. Pingback: ‘Kal Ho Naa Ho’ (2003): Review | Express Elevator to Hell - November 29, 2014

  6. Pingback: ‘Dil Se’ (1998): Review | Express Elevator to Hell - November 30, 2014

  7. Pingback: ‘Goliyon Ki Raasleela: Ram-Leela’ (2013): Review | Express Elevator to Hell - December 7, 2014

  8. Pingback: ‘Dilwale Dulhania Le Jayenge’ (1995): Review | Express Elevator to Hell - December 13, 2014

  9. Pingback: ‘Ae Dil Hai Mushkil’ (2016): Review | Express Elevator to Hell - November 29, 2016

  10. Pingback: ‘Krrish’ (2003, 2006, 2013): Trilogy Review | Express Elevator to Hell - June 26, 2017

  11. Pingback: ‘Padmaavat’ (2018): Review | Express Elevator to Hell - August 31, 2018

  12. Pingback: ‘The Wedding Party’ (2016, 2017): Melodramas Without Drama | Express Elevator to Hell - August 16, 2020

  13. Pingback: Telugu Reviews, Volume 5: ‘Shyam Singha Roy’ (2021), ‘Ante Sundaraniki,’ & ‘Sita Ramam’ (2022) | Express Elevator to Hell - October 30, 2022

  14. Pingback: Mani Ratnam’s ‘Roja’ (1992) & ‘Bombay’ (1995) | Express Elevator to Hell - December 18, 2022

  15. Pingback: ‘Magadheera’ (2009): The Pan-Indian Rajamouli Blockbuster-Prototype | Express Elevator to Hell - January 22, 2023

  16. Pingback: ‘BAC Nord’ (2020): The Stronghold of Marseille Crime | Express Elevator to Hell - February 8, 2023

  17. Pingback: ‘Pathaan’ (2023): The Return of Shah Rukh Khan | Express Elevator to Hell - March 31, 2023

  18. Pingback: ‘Devdas’ (1955): Everything Old is New Again | Express Elevator to Hell - May 7, 2023

Am I spot on? Am I full of it? Let me know!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: