you're reading...
-[Film Reviews]-, English Language Film Industries, Hollywood

‘Thor’ (2011): Marvel Movies Are Graded on a Curve


Directed by: Kenneth Branagh || Produced by: Kevin Feige

Screenplay by: Ashley Edward Miller, Zack Stentz, Don Payne || Starring: Chris Hemsworth, Natalie Portman, Tom Hiddleston, Stellan Skarsgard, Colm Feore, Ray Stevenson, Idris Elba, Kat Dennings, Rene Russo, Anthony Hopkins

Music by: Patrick Doyle || Cinematography: Haris Zambarloukos || Edited by: Paul Rubell || Country: United States || Language: English

Running Time: 114 minutes

Marvel Studios’ Thor is the perfect definition of a mediocre-at-best movie whose brand recognition, marketing, and shallow, effects-driven appeal elevated it to box office success it had no business achieving. After the Marvel Cinematic Universe’s (MCU) successful debut with Iron Man in 2008, Marvel quickly followed with The Incredible Hulk (2008) a little over a month later, which remains the lowest grossing film of the MCU (~$263 million) to date. Seemingly scrambling to regain the momentum conjured by Jon Favreau’s miraculous $585 million debut, a rushed, sloppily put together Iron Man 2 (2010) was released two years later. Amidst all this, however, Marvel continued to develop the other two key components in their now world-famous Avengers (2012, 2015) saga, Thor and Captain America. Given how rushed and forgettable seemingly every Marvel standalone film was after Iron Man and before The Winter Soldier (2014), it’s amazing how successful the franchise has become in hindsight, the box office returns of the original Iron Man and The Avengers notwithstanding.

Thor montage

Left: Hemsworth shows off his gym bod while attempting to free Mjolnir from the rocks. Right: Tom Hiddleston (left) adorns his reindeer helmet alongside his character’s step-mother, played by Rene Russo (right). I don’t remember her character’s name.

But then again, that’s the power of brand recognition, an unlimited marketing budget, and endless series of loud, seizure-inducing special effects. If this year’s Civil War (2016) is the pinnacle of the MCU thus far, Thor is most certainly the bottom of the barrel. General audiences somehow are under the perpetual impression that good movies always make money, and bad movies don’t.

Cinephiles, pause for laughter.

Anyhow, if you can’t tell I didn’t care for the original Thor movie, the highest grossing non-Iron Man standalone of Marvel’s “Phase One,” let me clarify my stance: Thor is a lame movie. It occasionally entertains, but is mostly just, well… lame.

Most of Thor’s problems have nothing to do with its script; it’s a relatively competent story as far as basic, character-driven narratives go, despite some confusing motivations with the villain, Tom Hiddleston’s Loki, in its final act. Thor himself is a one-note protagonist, but Chris Hemsworth plays him well and he has decent dialogue. Thor’s arc is satisfactory, transitioning from a cocky upstart in Asgard to a humbled fish-out-of-water on earth to regaining his powers and self-respect after defeating his rival Loki. Most everything wrong with the film stems from the screenplay’s transition to the screen; the film’s direction is lazy and hackneyed. Most every action scene begins with a dutch angle for no reason at all, the CGI is cartoony and fake-looking, and the numerous action scenes in the film’s final half hour are edited into oblivion.

Thor could have survived mediocre special FX (… how do you have middling CGI on a $150 million budget?) and sloppy action if its main character was memorable or if its supporting cast was up to par, but alas. Hemsworth is amusing enough, as I said, and Tom Hiddleston is as charismatic as always, but everyone else is bland. Natalie Portman is a flatline, Idris Elba is barely in the film, Anthony Hopkins has nothing to work with, and Colm Feore is irritating. This is arguably the worst supporting cast of any MCU film yet… except maybe Thor: The Dark World (2013). If Hemsworth’s protagonist had more depth to him than a goofy, muscled, fish-out-water archetype, his character could’ve saved this movie.

thor i'll have another

Come to think of it, Thor could’ve been a really great comedy film. Case in point…

Aside from a couple humorous gags after Thor arrives on earth, and some cornball dialogue by Hiddleston and Hemsworth in their characters’ final confrontation, there’s not much else to discuss. Thor isn’t a terrible or offensive film, but there’s nothing notworthy or memorable about it either. It’s occasional laughs and Hemsworth’s admirable performance are not worth nearly two hours of dutch angles and loud, incoherent computer FX. Pass.


SUMMARY & RECOMMENDATION: Thor is ruined by haphazard action-direction, poor special FX, lackluster supporting characters, and a plethora of hamfisted dialogue. It’s not worth watching for a tad more context while watching The Avengers.

HoweverThor’s story is formulaic but works well enough on its own. Hiddleston and Hemsworth do what they can with the material and have some funny moments between them.


? A movie solely dedicated to Thor adjusting to normal civilian life on earth, now that would be worth watching.

About The Celtic Predator

I love movies, music, video games, and big, scary creatures.


20 thoughts on “‘Thor’ (2011): Marvel Movies Are Graded on a Curve

  1. Finally there’s somebody else who disliked this movie. It’s so full of useless pathos that I could barely sit to the end of it.

    Posted by Indie Sci-Fi 451 | June 23, 2017, 4:44 pm
    • Agreed. I couldn’t fathom the ho-hum “shrug” attitude both critics and general audiences had toward this film. Both Thor movies, Iron Man sequels, and things like Ant-Man and Dr. Strange are why I find the MCU the most overrated franchise in filmmaking today.

      Posted by The Celtic Predator | June 23, 2017, 4:54 pm
  2. Well, they’re able to produce movies with quality high enough for certain kind of audience… Some of these movies were great, like first Avengers (at that time I really thought all this franchise would develop in a slightly different way) and few others, the others felt like an act of self-copying with various new ingredients added each time. For me it starts to feel like McDonalds, you know what you’ll get there even before you start and what not, at times some new dishes will appear just for the sake of experimenting, but that’s it.

    Posted by Indie Sci-Fi 451 | June 23, 2017, 6:50 pm
    • I think I agree with that. I genuinely enjoy several of their films, namely Iron Man ’08, The Winter Soldier, Avengers ’12, and Guardians of the Galaxy.

      Posted by The Celtic Predator | June 23, 2017, 7:01 pm
      • Yep, I liked exactly same movies, with the exception that The Winter Soldier felt… little bit too over-produced? It was good and wildly entertaining, but didn’t feel as genuine as Avengers. Guardians and the first Iron Men (if ”genuine” is a right word for a franchise movie by Marvel). Maybe it’s also because it wasn’t the first installment in the series and thus it didn’t have a refreshing effect like the others.

        Posted by Indie Sci-Fi 451 | June 23, 2017, 7:10 pm
      • Perhaps your lack of enthusiasm for it is because TWS is not a true superhero film (which is why I liked it). It’s essentially Jason Bourne with a shield, having more in common ’70s political thrillers and modern spy movies than the rest of the MCU.

        Posted by The Celtic Predator | June 23, 2017, 7:33 pm
      • Yeah, maybe. But I generally like more superhero movies that are not real superhero movies (like ”Defendor” or ”Super”). The Winter Soldier had a mix of many things, and that final battle felt little bit strange. Still, I find it pretty good.

        Posted by Indie Sci-Fi 451 | June 23, 2017, 8:01 pm


  1. Pingback: ‘Iron Man 3’ (2013): Review | Express Elevator to Hell - July 14, 2016

  2. Pingback: ‘X-Men: Apocalypse’ (2016): Review | Express Elevator to Hell - July 24, 2016

  3. Pingback: My Take on the Harry Potter Franchise (2001-2011): Not a Review | Express Elevator to Hell - November 16, 2016

  4. Pingback: ‘Doctor Strange’ (2016): Review | Express Elevator to Hell - December 5, 2016

  5. Pingback: ‘Wonder Woman’ (2017): Review | Express Elevator to Hell - June 8, 2017

  6. Pingback: ‘Solo’ (2018): Review | Express Elevator to Hell - June 27, 2018

  7. Pingback: ‘Dark Phoenix’ (2019): Review | Express Elevator to Hell - June 25, 2019

  8. Pingback: My Take on (The) Fast and (the) Furious Franchise (2001 – Present): Not a Review | Express Elevator to Hell - May 16, 2020

  9. Pingback: ‘Joker’ (2019): Warner Bros.’ Standalone Comic Drama Success | Express Elevator to Hell - June 22, 2021

  10. Pingback: An Overview of Marvel’s ‘Infinity Saga’ (2008-2019) | Express Elevator to Hell - July 20, 2021

  11. Pingback: ‘Andhaghaaram’ (2020): Give Yourself to the Dark Side | Express Elevator to Hell - November 3, 2021

  12. Pingback: A Look Back at the Marvel Cinematic Universe and the Future of the Superhero Film | Express Elevator to Hell - February 13, 2022

  13. Pingback: ‘The Black Phone’ (2021): Your Call is Important to Us | Express Elevator to Hell - July 4, 2022

Am I spot on? Am I full of it? Let me know!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: