//
you're reading...
-[Film Reviews]-, Hollywood, NORTH AMERICAN CINEMA

‘Aliens’ (1986): Review

aliens-1986

Directed by: James Cameron || Produced by: Gale Anne Hurd, Gordon Carroll, David Giler, Walter Hill

Written by: James Cameron || Starring: Sigourney Weaver, Carrie Henn, Michael Biehn, Lance Henriksen, William Hope, Paul Reiser, Bill Paxton, Jenette Goldstein, Al Matthews

Music by: James Horner || Cinematography by: Adrian Biddle || Editing by: Ray Lovejoy || Country: United States || Language: English

Running Time: 140 – 157 minutes

While James Cameron’s space marine-epic is best known for melding guns-blazing action with science fiction-mythology, I maintain that this film is, at its core, an action film — and there are few, if any, better action films out there. As Red Letter Media said, I like my sci-fi slow and dull, and I like my action fast and awesome. While this ’80s classic has its important, slower, character-driven moments (indicative of its legendary pacing and writing, courtesy of Cameron), Aliens is at its most formidable when the pulse rifles are blasting and the aliens are charging.

James Cameron and company execute every storytelling basic and special effect about as well as a film crew could. From the immaculate tension and atmosphere before each action sequence to some of the best narrative pacing in the business, from one of the best supporting casts in cinematic history to the marvelous Stan Winston special FX that still hold up to this day, Aliens gets most everything right. The core appeal of this film is its ability to blend likable, heartfelt characters with carefully crafted, well-paced action scenes.

aliens 1986 montage

A colorful cast of awesome space marines abound, featuring some of the coolest sci-fi weaponry since the lightsaber: The Smartgun, the Colonial Marine flame unit, and the M41A Pulse Rifle

Both key aspects of the film are departures from the franchise’s previous installment, Ridley Scott’s original Alien from 1979. Cameron made the smart and uncommon decision to stick to his strengths and take the fledgling Alien franchise in a new direction. Cameron’s at his best when he’s shooting no-holds-barred action and visceral, violent action set-pieces. This can be seen in his best movies, including Aliens, the Terminator series (1984, 1991), and True Lies (1994). The point I am trying to make here is that Cameron’s choice to drastically expand upon, elaborate on, and alter the tone of the original Alien by understanding and playing to what he does best as a filmmaker… that is what made Aliens a success. Far too many sequels focus on the close-minded idea of repeating what came before. Cameron took the universe established by Ridley Scott and added his own unique flavor. In that way, Cameron made the Alien universe his own as well.

Aliens‘ action sequences are a blend of found-footage elements and well edited, low-key lit shootouts. Much of the film’s first act is devoid of alien encounters, and the audience’s first introduction to the titular antagonists is several points-of-view removed from the action. Inspired by infamous news coverage and documentary analyses of the Vietnam War, James Cameron stages the aliens’ opening clash with our space-marines through POV helmet-cams, and we witness these scenes second-hand via Sigourney Weaver, Paul Reiser, and William Hope as they watch the carnage, helpless. Later action sequences feature elaborate shootouts in a variety of lighting setups and fast-paced editing, both of which enhance the intensity of each set-piece, all while keeping each character and maneuever in frame and in focus. Aliens‘ use of lighting, editing, and framing is some of the best I’ve ever seen in an action movie, and these impeccable cinematographic elements extend to the dialogue-driven character scenes.

More generally, Cameron and cinematographer Adrian Biddle (the latter’s first stint as director of photography) employ various condensed, motion-controlled long-takes with subtle yet effective editing from prolific film editor Ray Lovejoy to streamline dialogue scenes, build suspense before action sequences, and enhance chaotic intensity of the violence, while maintaining clarity of the characters within those set-pieces. Biddles’ smooth, almost nondescript tracking shots transition from singles to profile shots to ensemble stagings and back again with impressive fluidity, keeping the utilitarian dialogue snappy and likely saved much time on set. These techniques allow for great character interactions and actor freedom of movement, and subtle camera pans on medium length lenses make the most of these scenes’ limited, homogeneous geography. For most action sequences, the editing and camera movements grow shorter and faster, though Cameron rarely switches to free-form (i.e. non-camera stabilized) handheld for tracking shots, sticking with quick dollies or SteadiCams.

aliens 1986 montage

TOP: One-time actress Carrie Henn faces the clutches of the alien. BOTTOM: The most tenacious action scene in a movie teeming with excellent action sequences features Hudson’s (Paxton) pulse-pounding final stand. He may be a magnificent whiner, but he goes down like a man..

These set-pieces are often preceded by a sort of “crescendo to silence” whereby background music and Foley sound FX peak before a major event or alien attack, and are then undercut by dead silence, such as in the buildup to the first alien hive shootout, Ripley’s elevator descent into the nuclear reactor near the end of the film, and the final power-loader fight against the alien queen. In laymen’s terms, this sound editing could be described as the opposite of a jump-scare against a loud musical cue. This also emphasizes actors’ emotional reactions and amusing one-liners.

Speaking of which, the casting directors hit a home-run with their talent-selection, and Cameron demonstrates his utter command of acting-direction. I could go on for days about the effectiveness of the cast, how the expansive supporting cast is as effective as each starring member, how every line of dialogue is either haunting, funny, introspective, or critical to characterization. Sigourney Weaver’s most memorable costar is Michael Biehn, who plays the reluctant leader of our platoon of marines and also functions as the masculine voice of reason. Throughout the film, he is blocked as Weaver’s partner, both in terms of defensive teamwork against the alien threat as well as romantic tension. Their relationship is a brilliant example of building characterizations through framing, especially when Carrie Henn (starring in one of the greatest child roles of all time) is introduced. Showcasing some hilarious dialogue, great acting, and having all the best lines, is Bill Paxton. Paxton serves as much needed comic relief amidst the dark, grim atmosphere and pulse-pounding action. Jenette Goldstein and Lance Henrikson play a ferocious, tough-as-nails tomboy and a calculating android, receptively, rounding out a stellar supporting ensemble.

As much as I love the improvisation of Sacha Baron Cohen in Borat (2006), Joe Pesci’s tenacious, vicious dialogue in Goodfellas (1990), Robert De Niro’s crazed questioning of a certain, poor, likely very intimidated mirror in Taxi Driver (1976), Harrison Ford’s well known insight on both Raiders of the Lost Ark (1981) and The Empire Strikes Back (1980), and even R. Lee Ermy’s now legendary onslaught of ad lib insults in Full Metal Jacket (1987), I cannot, in good conscious, put any of those unscripted performances above what Paxton did with Private Hudson in this movie. Few lines in cinema are as memorable and glorious as Paxton’s frantic complaints. As another much more talented writer than I so eloquently put it, Paxton, a frequent collaborator and friend of Cameron, elevates whining to an art form here as Private Husdon.

One final feature of Aliens that is integral to both its protagonist and the series’ overarching theme, is the feminist subtext of the picture. A common theme that runs throughout the Alien franchise is the heroic character of Ripley and how she is frequently ignored or not taken seriously by her male superiors. Her strengths and past experience with the alien threat are continually overlooked, and each installment in the series strongly implies she is ignored because she is female. In Cameron’s film, this theme is expressed most effectively due to the great script that gives ample time for Ripley’s character to develop, and to the other strong female characters present as well. Female marines are part of combat squads just as much as their male counterparts, and Henn’s performance provides Weaver’s character with opportunity to grow and overcome challenges. Furthermore, Ripley’s character is not a hyper-sexualized male fantasy, nor is she a caricatured Xena Warrior-Princess — her development is tied to her motherhood, her relationships with Hicks and Newt, and her believable flaws, insecurities, and resourceful problem-solving.

That is why Aliens is my favorite movie of all time. It may not be the best I’ve ever seen — I never said it was — but it connects with me more than any other film ever has. Plus, It’s damned fun. I do believe it is one of Hollywood’s greatest.

Queen

One of James Cameron’s and special effects wizard Stan Winston’s greatest creative achievements: The Queen.

Look at the great script that features near perfect pacing and builds toward a roller-coaster action-experience. Look at the intelligent dialogue and characters from James Cameron (and some terrific ad lib from the actors!) that make the story feel authentic and have meaning to it. Look at the magnificent special FX from Hollywood legend, Stan Winston, which put so many movies before and after it to shame, enhanced by painstaking cinematography and crisp, yet chaotic editing. Experience the powerful, intense nature of Aliens, with a supporting cast for the ages. Aliens is so damned good, it rightly belongs among the upper echelon of science-fiction films like 2001: A Space Odyssey (1968), Blade Runner (1982), Star Wars (1977), and Star Trek (1966-1969, 1987-1994), as well as action-legends like Die Hard (1988), The Matrix (1999), Hard Boiled (1992), and The Raid (2011). This is James Cameron’s definitive masterpiece.

——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————–

SUMMARY & RECOMMENDATION: Aliens features one of the most memorable supporting casts ever put to film, led by Sigourney Weaver’s magnum opus performance. The only things better than its great cast’s chemistry are Cameron’s action-direction, ferocious special FX courtesy of Stan Winston, and impeccable editing that heightens the intensity of each conversation and extraterrestrial encounter. Aliens also boasts thematic depth and continuity in its imagery and characterizations.

However… despite its influence and ambition, the miniatures, robotics, and puppeteer effects of the Power Loader-Queen fight in the film’s climax lack polish. This is one false-ending that could’ve gone.

—> Aliens comes HIGHLY RECOMMENDED.

? We’re on an express elevator to hell, going down!

About The Celtic Predator

I love movies, music, video games, and big, scary creatures.

Discussion

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. Pingback: ‘Act of Valor’ (2012): Review | Express Elevator to Hell - October 9, 2014

  2. Pingback: ‘The Lord of the Rings’ (2001-2003): Review | Express Elevator to Hell - November 17, 2014

  3. Pingback: ‘Scarface’ (1983): Review | Express Elevator to Hell - November 17, 2014

  4. Pingback: ‘The Godfather’ (1972): Review | Express Elevator to Hell - November 17, 2014

  5. Pingback: ‘The Raid’ (2011): Review | Express Elevator to Hell - November 18, 2014

  6. Pingback: ‘Interstellar’ (2014): Review | Express Elevator to Hell - November 18, 2014

  7. Pingback: ‘Predator’ (1987): Review | Express Elevator to Hell - November 18, 2014

  8. Pingback: ‘Predators’ (2010): Review | Express Elevator to Hell - November 19, 2014

  9. Pingback: ‘The Dark Knight’ (2008): Review | Express Elevator to Hell - November 22, 2014

  10. Pingback: ‘Independence Day’ (1996): Review | Express Elevator to Hell - November 26, 2014

  11. Pingback: ‘Edge of Tomorrow’ (2014): Review | Express Elevator to Hell - November 27, 2014

  12. Pingback: ‘Alien 3′ (1992): Review | Express Elevator to Hell - November 28, 2014

  13. Pingback: ‘Alien’ (1979): Review | Express Elevator to Hell - November 28, 2014

  14. Pingback: ‘Full Metal Jacket’ (1987): Review | Express Elevator to Hell - November 30, 2014

  15. Pingback: ‘Alien vs Predator’ (2004): Review | Express Elevator to Hell - November 30, 2014

  16. Pingback: ‘Prometheus’ (2012): Review | Express Elevator to Hell - November 30, 2014

  17. Pingback: ‘The Wolf of Wall Street’ (2013): Review | Express Elevator to Hell - December 1, 2014

  18. Pingback: ‘Alien Resurrection’ (1997): Review | Express Elevator to Hell - December 2, 2014

  19. Pingback: ‘Psycho’ (1960): Review | Express Elevator to Hell - December 4, 2014

  20. Pingback: ‘Saving Private Ryan’ (1998): Review | Express Elevator to Hell - December 13, 2014

  21. Pingback: ‘Avatar’ (2009): Review | Express Elevator to Hell - December 13, 2014

  22. Pingback: The Problem with PG-13 and the Modern Emasculation of Mainstream Films | Express Elevator to Hell - December 27, 2014

  23. Pingback: Top 10 Remakes, Reboots, and Re-Imaginings in Cinema | Express Elevator to Hell - January 1, 2015

  24. Pingback: ‘Whiplash’ (2014): Review | Express Elevator to Hell - January 6, 2015

  25. Pingback: ‘Dog Soldiers’ (2002): Review | Express Elevator to Hell - February 5, 2015

  26. Pingback: Neill Blomkamp set to direct new ‘Alien’ sequel | Express Elevator to Hell - February 18, 2015

  27. Pingback: Neill Blomkamp’s ‘Alien’ sequel will ignore half of the franchise, Sigourney Weaver confirmed | Express Elevator to Hell - February 25, 2015

  28. Pingback: ‘Chappie’ (2015): Review | Express Elevator to Hell - March 13, 2015

  29. Pingback: Elite Squad 2: The Enemy Within | Express Elevator to Hell - March 31, 2015

  30. Pingback: ‘Avengers: Age of Ultron’ (2015): Review | Express Elevator to Hell - May 14, 2015

  31. Pingback: ‘Elysium’ (2013): Review | Express Elevator to Hell - June 2, 2015

  32. Pingback: ‘Predator 2′ (1990): Review | Express Elevator to Hell - June 6, 2015

  33. Pingback: ‘The Terminator’ (1984): Review | Express Elevator to Hell - July 2, 2015

  34. Pingback: The Movie-Medium Debate: Film vs Digital | Express Elevator to Hell - September 19, 2015

  35. Pingback: Best of 2015: Everything Old is New Again | Express Elevator to Hell - February 23, 2016

  36. Pingback: ‘Terminator 2: Judgement Day’ (1991): Review | Express Elevator to Hell - March 9, 2016

  37. Pingback: ‘Jurassic Park’ (1993): Review | Express Elevator to Hell - March 15, 2016

  38. Pingback: Rules Aren’t Always Made to be Broken: Top Five Filmmaking Pet-Peeves | Express Elevator to Hell - September 10, 2016

  39. Pingback: ‘Arrival’ (2016): Review | Express Elevator to Hell - December 2, 2016

  40. Pingback: ‘The Mist’ (2007): Review | Express Elevator to Hell - May 19, 2017

  41. Pingback: ‘Alien: Covenant’ (2017): Review | Express Elevator to Hell - May 29, 2017

  42. Pingback: ‘Blade Runner’ (1982) & ‘Blade Runner 2049’ (2017): Review | Express Elevator to Hell - October 18, 2017

Am I spot on? Am I full of it? Let me know!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: