//
you're reading...
-[Film Reviews]-, Hollywood, NORTH AMERICAN CINEMA

‘Jason Bourne’ (2016): Review

jason bourne-poster1

Directed by: Paul Greengrass || Produced by: Paul Greengrass, Matt Damon, Jeffrey M. Weiner, Ben Smith, Gregory Goodman

Screenplay by: Paul Greengrass, Christopher Rouse || Starring: Matt Damon, Tommy Lee Jones, Alicia Vikander, Vincent Cassel, Julia Stiles, Riz Ahmed, Ato Essandoh, Scott Shepard, Bill Camp, Vinzenz, Kiefer, Gregg Henry

Music by: John Powell, David Buckley || Cinematography: Barry Ackroyd || Edited by: Christopher Rouse || Country: United States || Language: English

Running Time: 123 minutes

If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it. Not all films and franchises can abide by that rule, given how so many remakes, reboots, and unnecessary sequels fall flat due to ill timing or fear of taking risks. Innovation is praised throughout film history and film culture, and the first to successfully break trends (e.g. Deadpool [2016]) or popularize a new way of looking at something old (e.g. The Dark Knight [2008]) often break box office records, if not garner critical awards.

jason bourne montage

Top Left to Bottom Left, clockwise: Jason Bourne (Damon) chills in southern Greece; later, Bourne jumps a Dodge Charger over a Las Vegas curb; citizens riot in Athens; Bourne lays the smack down on a hacker.

That’s not the case with franchises that celebrate vintage formula or have achieved a repeated, proven recipe for success, like Star Wars (1977-present), Indiana Jones (1981, 1984, 1989), or James Bond (1962-present). Despite a few generational updates here and there, pop culture staples like those are mostly immune to the fluctuations of audience taste and political atmosphere. Tales like those are timeless, and certain archetypes will always be universal blueprints that audiences of any stripe can relate to.

In my opinion, the espionage adventures of Jason Bourne are on par with the serial rhythms of an Indiana Jones. The series came of age in the early to mid-2000’s, when the Internet phenomenon was also maturing and the world had shifted from the grime and grit of the 1980’s and ’90’s to the cyberpunk and black ops espionage of the new millennium. However much Generation X’ers may lament the glory days of political incorrectness and classical spies like Roger Moore, Matt Damon’s career-defining role has reinvented the modern spy-film through its no-bullshit approach to action, chase sequences, and a completely different type of black ops agent.

The first trilogy (Identity [2002], Supremacy [2004], Ultimatum [2007]) dealt with CIA operations and identity, the ethics of unilateral reconnaissance as well as its title character’s quest to find himself. Jason Bourne (henceforth, JB) adds closure to this chapter while still leaving the door open for further adventure, bringing the journey full-circle from Bourne’s existential crises back to the purpose of national defense in a globalized, information-dominated economy.

This slight change-up from Bourne’s amnesia-anxiety is a smart move, as the previous three films covered that ad nauseum to the point where Damon once joked they’d have to call a prospective fourth film “The Bourne Redundancy.” Perhaps it is fitting then, that this latest feature is simply dubbed “Jason Bourne,” as his questions of identity are over and his memory loss, for the most part, restored. To that end, JB analyzes the modern ideals of patriotism, American values, and the changing modus operandi of America’s national defense organizations. Thematically speaking, JB is nuanced in these discussions and makes the wise point that its title character was never anti-American or even necessarily anti-intelligence — he was simply a spy who was manipulated, lied to, and had regained his conscious.

jason bourne montage ii

TOP: Vincent Cassel spots his prey in the now classic Greengrass gunsight-shot. BOTTOM: Alicia Vikander surveys her field team from a CIA van.

Besides its story and character growth, JB features some of the best action of the series, as well as some of the greatest action sequences of the 2010’s so far. Returning director (and now also writer) Paul Greengrass demonstrates his mastery of the shaky-cam action scene, crafting intense sequences of car chases, mob riots, and a final hand-to-hand faceoff between Damon and antagonist Vincent Cassell, the latter of which rivals the excellent Bourne v. Desh battle in Ultimatum. The Las Vegas chase set-piece, which has been flaunted in the film’s marketing, is amazing and may be the franchise’s best vehicular mayhem yet. Anyone who puts stock in terrific action sequences will not be at a loss for them here. Jason Bourne is a fantastic action-piece.

JB bolsters its eponymous role with several great supporting characters, including young, up-and-comer Alicia Vikander, Tommy Lee Jones as the one old white guy Hollywood hasn’t yet cast as a CIA director, and Vincent Cassell as the one European guy Hollywood hasn’t yet cast as a CIA “asset.” JB elaborates on the latter role by giving Cassell a personal vendetta against Bourne, adding further tension to their action-packed brawl in the movie’s finale. All three supporting roles, as well as an emotional guest appearance from series’ regular Julia Stiles, strengthen the overall narrative without removing focus from Matt Damon.

I see no reason for people to view this film as a case of “been there, done that.” Jason Bourne is the best blockbuster this summer since Civil War (2016), and does its franchise label proud. In one way, it retains the tenacious action, slick editing, and tonal intensity the series is famous for, but in another, it moves beyond Bourne’s quest for memory and brings closure to his epic story. While the Bourne series may not outlast its star, unlike James Bond, I’m glad the gang returned for at least one more go-around. Jason Bourne is an absolute blast.

——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————-

SUMMARY & RECOMMENDATION: Paul Greengrass and Matt Damon return for a fourth tour of duty, and they do not disappoint. Jason Bourne remains at the top of its game, action-wise, and chooses thematic ambiguity over its titular figure’s place in modern American iconography. Instead of outright patriotism or condemnation, Jason Bourne chooses both, and gets to have its cake and eat it too.

—> RECOMMENDED

? You’re never gonna find any peace — not until you admit to yourself who you really are.

About The Celtic Predator

I love movies, music, video games, and big, scary creatures.

Discussion

4 thoughts on “‘Jason Bourne’ (2016): Review

  1. Nice review. I really liked the movie. Don’t understand the fairly common negative reviews. Brilliant action scenes, clever plot twists, etc.

    Posted by Robert O. Lincoln | August 28, 2016, 11:17 pm
    • As far as genre and franchise contracts are concerned, I don’t know what else other people were expecting. It was another powerful action piece starring its title character, made by a great director, with themes of espionage, national security, and patriotism. I got what I wanted.

      Posted by The Celtic Predator | August 31, 2016, 1:27 pm
  2. Glad to see some more love for this movie. I enjoyed it all around. I did feel like it could have been something…more, or at least something a little different. However, considering it’s a franchise (not counting Legacy) that has been dormant for 9 years, it was probably more appropriate to make the movie a little more familiar than doing something vastly different. Much like how The Force Awakens relied a lot on trying to feel familiar. I really had no legitimate complaints with the movie.
    There’s always going to be those that just don’t like Greengrass’s style. I was shocked to see how many reviews I saw that had the complaint of “shaky cam”. Really? You should know that going in.
    I do hope that the franchise does leer into a different direction should they continue with more movies, but I felt this was a great installment, and even offered more closer to what Ultimatum didn’t end up closing on. Almost felt like an epilogue and a potential new beginning thrown into one.

    Posted by The Film Editorial | August 29, 2016, 11:13 am
    • I felt it offered enough of the same formula, action and direction-wise, that I wanted from another Greengrass Bourne-film, while at the same time moving on from its title character’s quest for identity. I enjoyed how the story brought its franchise’s themes full-circle by positing the need for field agents, intelligence infrastructure, and national security apparatus *despite* the CIA’s overreach and lack of oversight. It’s about the individual’s (e.g. Bourne’s) place within these organizations of nation-states.

      The Bourne franchise has never been as simple as “CIA = bad,” “anarchy = good” like the Christian Dassault character advocates in this film. That’s what I like about it, its shades of grey.

      Posted by The Celtic Predator | August 31, 2016, 1:37 pm

Am I spot on? Am I full of it? Let me know!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: