you're reading...
-[Film Reviews]-, Hollywood, NORTH AMERICAN CINEMA

‘Star Wars’ (1977): Review

star wars original poster

Directed by: George Lucas || Produced by: Gary Kurtz

Screenplay by: George Lucas || Starring: Mark Hamill, Harrison Ford, Carrie Fisher, Peter Cushing, Alec Guinness, Peter Cushing, David Prowse, Anthony Daniels, Kenny Baker, Peter Mayhew

Music by: John Williams || Cinematography: Gilbert Taylor || Edited by: Paul Hirsch, Marcia Lucas, Richard Chew || Country: United States || Language: English

Running Time: 121 minutes

After almost two and a half years of blogging on Express Elevator to Hell, at last we’ve come to this; when I first started this site in 2013, I rattled off several reviews of my favorite films that I considered the best and/or most entertaining I’d ever seen, but unfortunately those early choices were geared solely toward films I’d seen later in my adolescence and early “adulthood.” My blogging habits subsequently gained steam and I moved to new release film reviews and coverage of foreign films I had started to get into at the time; many of my early childhood favorites were ignored until recently, and now finally we’ve come to one of the most influential films in American pop culture, in the history of cinema worldwide, and one of the biggest movies that changed my life forever: Star Wars.

cantina star wars

Watch your step; this place can be a little rough.

There’s only one other film that arguably influenced me more than the original Star Wars trilogy (1977, 1980, 1983), but we’ll get to that at a later time. I saw this trilogy when I was very, very young —- so young that it’s hard to remember a time when I didn’t know the Force, Luke Skywalker, Darth Vader, Han Solo, and the Millennium Falcon. The film’s canonical universe is so ingrained into my brain and larger persona that it’s impossible to think of my own life or greater American pop culture without it. Even those mindless, ignorant brats who are my millennial generation brethren who haven’t seen or fully appreciated Star Wars yet are affected by it every day, both directly and indirectly, in the annual pop culture pastiche they consume; Star Wars not only changed the American film industry overnight, it changed cinema history forever and has become a pop culture phenomenon for decades, a milestone of creative achievement that shows no signs of slowing down as we await the much anticipated Star Wars: The Force Awakens (Q4, 2015). Hopefully, it won’t suck….like the last three Star Wars films did… :/

In any case, Star Wars changed me forever and for the better, and not because I was young or naive or easily impressionable (which I certainly was), but rather because it and its sequels (not prequels!) are amazing films. I’ve watched them numerous times over the years, including the original 1977 masterpiece just minutes ago, so trust me —- they still hold up.

It’s been said many times and in many different ways that George Lucas probably gets far too much credit for single-handedly “creating” Star Wars. He can certainly be thanked for that initial creative spark, but the man has always been more of an abstract, brainstorming “idea-machine” rather than any sort of coherent screenwriter or actors’ director. I got a lot of respect for the guy given the shit he went through making the first Star Wars (the 1977 film was plagued by production problems), but the fact of the matter is that SW as a whole was an artistic project conceived through compromise and collaboration with many artists — not just George Lucas. The man didn’t even write or direct The Empire Strikes Back (1980) or direct or principally write Return of the Jedi (1983), and do I really need to remind everyone how the prequels (1999, 2002, 2005) turned out? I’d rather not think about them right now.

The scoundrel, the muscle, and the golden boy… the best use of stock characters in 20th century pop culture.

The original Star Wars (later renamed and “Episode-numbered” to IV: A New Hope) was rewritten numerous times from George’s incoherent first drafts, virtually saved in editing by Paul Hirsch, Marcia Lucas, Richard Chew, and producer Gary Kurtz, and was in many ways enhanced by the limitations of the then groundbreaking special effects by Lucas’ recently founded Industrial Light and Magic. Again, I got nothing against Lucas, personally, and he did lead a great effort to bring the vision of Star Wars to the big screen, but let’s just all admit that the original Star Wars trilogy is not the best example of the auteur theory. Hell, if anything, Star Wars (along with Steven Spielberg’s earlier film, Jaws [1975]), destroyed the mainstream American auteur of the 1960’s and ’70’s…and ever since.

Star Wars itself, though, in its original unaltered form, is a great film regardless whoever gets the most “credit” for creating it. While it essentially destroyed the American New Wave, its recalling of grand, classical Hollywood storytelling and adventure serials, its way of boiling and blending them into a sort of new age science-fiction/fantasy-western, is the height of surrealist creativity and cinematic originality. Compared to the generally heavy and boring (according to some) or artsy and avant-garde (according to others) science-fiction films of the time, Star Wars was a radical game-changer that struck the movie-going world (and especially its native United States) at the perfect time. The Vietnam War had been raging for over a decade and was finally coming to a close, Watergate had disillusioned our political climate, and people needed an escape. Enter Star Wars, a good ole-fashioned simple story that the general public could relate to.

Though high-concept proto-blockbusters had existed in some form before 1977 (e.g. D.W. Griffith’s Birth of a Nation [1915], Victor Fleming’s Gone with the Wind [1939]), Star Wars broke Hollywood and established the wide-release mainstream film as America’s cinematic bread and butter. Every single mass-audience pandering blockbuster released since then owes a debt to Star Wars in some way. Star Wars wasn’t just an influential blockbuster, it remains the definitive American blockbuster experience.

Like I said, it recalled conventional Hollywood storytelling and invisible editing. It follows a relatable everyman protagonist (Mark Hamill’s Luke Skywalker) and his wise older mentor (Alec Guiness’ Obi-Wan Kenobi), a “damsel-in-distress” (Carrie Fisher’s Princess Leia), an adventurous rogue (Harrison Ford’s Han Solo), a straightforward villain (David Prowse’s Darth Vader), and of course, gay robots (Anthony Daniels’ C-3PO and Kenny Baker’s R2-D2). It’s cinematography embraces the narrative flow and character emotions of the moment, emphasizing grand scale and a never-ending sense of adventure rather than the existential, self-reflexive filmmaking style that Lucas’ and Spielberg’s movie-brat peers had popularized at the time.

star wars montage

Top: Our original triumphant trio of misfit heroes. Bottom: Welcome to the Force, Luke. It will always be with you…

Another way of putting it is that Star Wars is vintage monomyth, the “The Hero’s Journey” that Joseph Campbell recognized in his 1949 book, The Hero with a Thousand Faces. Exploitation of this universal archetypal story-structure is how Hollywood has made its billions, and Star Wars is the epitome of that. You can pretty much follow Campbell’s monomyth beat-for-beat and explain Star Wars‘ narrative structure. In many ways the blueprint is hopelessly derivative, but then again the vast majority of human storytelling is unconsciously, subconsciously, or consciously based on this formula, and Star Wars is commendable based on its flawless execution of that formula, alone. To that end, the genre-blend flavor of Star Wars is so unique and original that any criticism of its rejection of New Hollywood filmmaking comes across as hopeless arthouse-butthurt. It’s fucking Star Wars, people, show some respect!

Star Wars‘ narrative unfolds so organically and executes the definitive monomyth almost effortlessly, as if it came into cinemas to establish itself as the definitive hero’s journey of our time —- which it pretty much is. The film is paced to near-perfection, expanding from that unforgettable Star Destroyer-opening and the droid escape-prologue into Luke’s vintage underdog-protagonist story. Then you have your call of duty, the refusal of the call of duty, the destruction of innocence, and the rapid expansion of the story into mythic proportions.

The young hero on a journey and the classic battle of good vs. evil, that is what Star Wars is all about. It’s inherent formula may be the single least original thing in art history, but its execution of it is anything but, and that artistic execution is the thing that matters. Though several special effects haven’t aged too well, Star Wars as a whole still holds up after nearly forty years and endless waves of CGI-revolutions. In many ways the visuals feel more raw and more real because of their limitations and the way Lucas had to direct around them, relying on them to aide the storytelling rather than replace the story altogether (…as the prequels did).

Though in hindsight the main characters of the first Star Wars were in their creative infancy, their sympathetic nature is integral to the story’s appeal. Luke is young, bright-eyed, and bushy-tailed, and quite whiny, as is his then undiscovered sister, Leia; their dialogue isn’t the greatest, but it works well enough and Harrison Ford’s highbrow, charismatic performance as Han Solo lights up every scene he’s in. Strangely enough, Prowse’s Darth Vader isn’t much more than your average thuggish bad-guy in this first film; he’s basically just an asshole in a robot suite, and that functions just fine in this simple space-adventure tale. His relationship with Guiness’ Kenobi is an intriguing tease, but it doesn’t stretch beyond that until Empire Strikes Back. It was a simpler time I guess.

There’s really not much more to discuss with the phenomenon that was and still is Star Wars. I think I’ve hit all the major points regarding its unmovable pop culture status — its creative “godfather” George Lucas, its recollection of classical Hollywood filmmaking and monomythic storytelling, its unforgettable archetypal characters, and its groundbreaking yet still limited special effects. A full discussion of its pop culture influence could last thousands of words further (and I sort of already did that in my first blog page), but I sampled the major bits.

Bottom line: If you haven’t seen Star Wars and you don’t consider yourself the kind of person who lives under a rock, go fucking see it immediately. What the hell’s wrong with you? I don’t care if you’re not American or are a first-generation American or don’t even like movies —- if there’s one single American pop cultural milestone you should see (and appreciate!) from the entire 20th century, it should be this. I’m not saying everyone has to love or even like it (though not doing so is indicative of a heart of stone and/or a hatred of fun), but everyone should appreciate the masterpiece that is Star Wars. Go and see it now if you haven’t, or rewatch it if you already have —- and then watch Empire Strikes Back (1980) and Return of the Jedi (1983). And never, ever, ever, ever, ever watch the prequels!

star wars montage ii

Star Wars: Just too many iconic moments to list!


SUMMARY & RECOMMENDATION: Star Wars molds its archetypal epic journey and characters in a creative explosion of genre-fusion that hasn’t been beaten since. It’s science-fiction, it’s fantasy, it’s western, and it’s pure cinema. The film’s groundbreaking special effects and iconic score amaze to this day. Harrison Ford’s performance alone remains a staple of the modern male-movie-star badass.

However… much of Hamill’s and Fischer’s dialogue leaves a lot to be desired. Some special effects do show their age.

—> Star Wars, in case there was every any doubt, comes HIGHLY RECOMMENDED.

? But make sure they’re the original, unaltered versions of the original trilogy! Stay away from any and all “special editions”…

? Star Wars: The Force Awakens? More like Star Wars: Needs to Take a Nap!

About The Celtic Predator

I love movies, music, video games, and big, scary creatures.


40 thoughts on “‘Star Wars’ (1977): Review

  1. I love this piece. You write very well, glad to have discovered your blog, and someone else who appreciates great film. This film is like lifeblood to so many people. It has sparked so much creative force that it is impossible to deny. Of course, there are always those who rally against it – but you really feel as though they are mostly doing that to be awkward.

    Posted by garethrhodes | April 25, 2015, 3:44 am
    • I’m glad that you discovered this site and are enjoying it! Thank you for the kind words.

      Part of my ranting was the result of the past few years going to college and meeting lots of international and/or first gen Americans who haven’t seen SW, as well as some homegrown Americans who never saw it and really shocked me. Perhaps what disturbs me most is that, to a lot of people, the prequels are as much “original” SW as the originals are…or worse, they’ve only seen the prequels! Yikes…

      Posted by The Celtic Predator | April 25, 2015, 4:46 pm
  2. I’ve seen Star Wars, but can’t remember if I’ve seen the other two. (I don’t acknolwedge the three prequels, sequels or whatever the fuck they’re supposed to be.) I acknowledge Star Wars in cinema history the same way I acknowledge the Beatles in music history; a sort of browbeaten ‘well if everybody says so’ kind of way.

    I was 12 years old when I became aware of a buzz surrounding a film called Star Wars. It coincided with public outrage over a new comic called 2000AD and I suppose I chose to follow the left hand path instead of the road populated by heroes.

    But whether one likes the film or not its position in the timeline of cinema is secure and unshakeable. Unlike the Death Star!


    ps I wish I still had those original issues of 2000AD. I could retire a rich man from selling them.

    Posted by The Opening Sentence | April 25, 2015, 1:50 pm
    • I think I read 2000AD when I was like 5-6. I have few clear memories of them at this point, but I remember them being fun.

      On SW, I just want everybody to have seen them (the originals). They’re sorta like Psycho, Citizen Kane, Gone with the Wind, etc. at this point —- basic check marks of major cinematic landmarks that everyone should see at least once in their lives. I understand not everyone loves sci-fi/fantasy, but I can’t think of a much more mass-appealing property than Star Wars.

      I’m not much of a rom-com fan, but I have seen How to Lose a Guy in 10 Days….

      Posted by The Celtic Predator | April 25, 2015, 4:50 pm
      • I have made it a mission to see the classic films: at least one film by all the classic directors, and one featuring classic film stars. It’s educational and always surprising where it leads you. (Still haven’t seen The Exorcist though.)

        To understand the effect 2000AD had on the great British public, the most violent thing in kids’ comics at that time was a pair of horns sticking out of Desperate Dan’s cowpie. Then along came Judge Dredd!

        Maybe I’ll have a relook at the original SW trilogy. I’ve been going through a very 70s nostalgic mood lately.

        Posted by The Opening Sentence | April 26, 2015, 4:04 am


  1. Pingback: ‘Avengers: Age of Ultron’ (2015): Review | Express Elevator to Hell - May 14, 2015

  2. Pingback: ‘The Hobbit’ (2012-2014, Fan-Edit Re-evaluated): Review | Express Elevator to Hell - June 10, 2015

  3. Pingback: ‘Raiders of the Lost Ark’ (1981): Review | Express Elevator to Hell - July 3, 2015

  4. Pingback: ‘Spider-Man’ (2002): Review | Express Elevator to Hell - July 14, 2015

  5. Pingback: ‘Pulp Fiction’ (2015): Review | Express Elevator to Hell - July 19, 2015

  6. Pingback: The Movie-Medium Debate: Film vs Digital | Express Elevator to Hell - September 19, 2015

  7. Pingback: ‘King Kong’ (2005): Review | Express Elevator to Hell - September 23, 2015

  8. Pingback: PC Crutches and Pot-shots: Using Movie’s as Personal Soapboxes | Express Elevator to Hell - September 29, 2015

  9. Pingback: Films are not Subjective | Express Elevator to Hell - October 28, 2015

  10. Pingback: ‘Return of the Jedi’ (1983): Review | Express Elevator to Hell - December 15, 2015

  11. Pingback: ‘The Force Awakens’ (2015): Review | Express Elevator to Hell - January 5, 2016

  12. Pingback: ‘Alien’ (1979): Review | Express Elevator to Hell - January 24, 2016

  13. Pingback: ‘Terminator 2: Judgement Day’ (1991): Review | Express Elevator to Hell - March 9, 2016

  14. Pingback: ‘Back to the Future’ (1985): Review | Express Elevator to Hell - March 15, 2016

  15. Pingback: ‘Jurassic Park’ (1993): Review | Express Elevator to Hell - March 15, 2016

  16. Pingback: ‘Elysium’ (2013): Review | Express Elevator to Hell - July 17, 2016

  17. Pingback: ‘Jason Bourne’ (2016): Review | Express Elevator to Hell - August 8, 2016

  18. Pingback: ‘Independence Day’ (1996): Review | Express Elevator to Hell - August 11, 2016

  19. Pingback: ‘Firefly’ (2002): Review | Express Elevator to Hell - September 14, 2016

  20. Pingback: ‘Pandorum’ (2009): Review | Express Elevator to Hell - November 30, 2016

  21. Pingback: ‘Arrival’ (2016): Review | Express Elevator to Hell - December 2, 2016

  22. Pingback: ‘Rogue One: A Star Wars Story’ (2016): Review | Express Elevator to Hell - December 18, 2016

  23. Pingback: ‘The Mist’ (2007): Review | Express Elevator to Hell - May 19, 2017

  24. Pingback: ‘Hellboy’ (2004): Review | Express Elevator to Hell - July 30, 2017

  25. Pingback: ‘Looper’ (2012): Review | Express Elevator to Hell - October 5, 2017

  26. Pingback: ‘Sholay’ (1975): Review | Express Elevator to Hell - October 12, 2017

  27. Pingback: ‘Die Hard’ (1988): Review | Express Elevator to Hell - December 10, 2017

  28. Pingback: ‘The Last Jedi’ (2017): Review | Express Elevator to Hell - December 31, 2017

  29. Pingback: ‘Solo’ (2018): Review | Express Elevator to Hell - June 27, 2018

  30. Pingback: To Defend or Not to Defend The Matrix Sequels? | Express Elevator to Hell - June 29, 2018

  31. Pingback: The Devil on Your Shoulder, Last Part: Like My Father Before Me | Express Elevator to Hell - December 3, 2018

  32. Pingback: M. Night Shyamalan’s ‘Unbreakable’ (2000, 2016, 2019): Trilogy Review | Express Elevator to Hell - February 20, 2019

  33. Pingback: Comparing and Contrasting ‘Infinity War’ (2018) and ‘Endgame’ (2019) | Express Elevator to Hell - May 15, 2019

  34. Pingback: ‘King of the Monsters’ (2019): Review | Express Elevator to Hell - June 14, 2019

  35. Pingback: Sergio Leone’s ‘Once Upon a Time… in the West [1968], the Revolution [1971], in America’ [1984]: Triple Review | Express Elevator to Hell - July 20, 2019

Am I spot on? Am I full of it? Let me know!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: